Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 09:55

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Will India ever surpass China in Technology?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Filmmakers/Actors Vote On 21st Century Films - Dark Horizons
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Why do Democrats call any Republican "Magats", like they are subhuman?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
The solar system's greatest mystery may finally be solved - Phys.org